SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT
GSAT 54.38+7.0%3:59 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29900)10/26/2023 10:59:55 AM
From: pcstel  Read Replies (1) of 29986
 
We shall see. The major difference here is that with Starlink, the terminal cost is in many cases higher than the sales price. With Direct to Cell. There are no "subsidy costs" directly to the D2C provider.

By funneling all of the connection options (messaging, Voice, Video Call, Data) via X.com. Starlink can determine available bandwidth and throttle usage in a given Spot Beam. (Throttle "Wacky Wireless").

So having ultimate control of the data usage, (compression algorithms for video chat) in a given spot beam. X.Com and Starlink will operate intertwined. Billing will be done in real time via X.Com via micro-transactions.

So you will need an X.Com account to use D2C. (Messaging, Voice, Video, Data) All billing will be done via X.Com (with a 3% "billing processing fee" out of the cost paid to Starlink for the services).

So X.Com can provide "real-time demand based pricing" for Voice, Video Chat, Web Data Services.

No demand pricing for messaging, because the resources used are negligible.

PCSTEL
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext