SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Pokersam's Swamp Drain

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: POKERSAM11/3/2023 5:00:13 PM
   of 4383
 
Windy -- Here is an example of just how incompetent you really are.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this chart and it is still valid. Just because you do not know how it is still valid does not make it so. You do not know what I was expecting.
Everything you imagine is my count after this chart is totally incorrect. Go back and hit the books and try to learn a few things. You just continue to embarrass yourself to those who know EWP.
Oh, I seldom post a chart here. If I did post a current chart the beginning of it would look just like this one.lol
Yes, I posted this chart a month ago and what it predicted HAPPENED, LOLOL You were calling for a bounce in wave 5 a few days later. LOLOL How many times have you called for the end of 4 and the bounce in 5 since 4607? I Think you are on at least your third one. My goodness what a mess.

To: POKERSAM who wrote (4229)11/3/2023 3:16:34 PM
From: #Breeze of 7292
Pokersam, here's the wave count you posted on 9/1. You were expecting a Wave [iii]. The low for your Wave [iii] was 1.618 x Wave . Now the move off that Wave [iii] low has overlapped your Wave . So this wave count has been INVALIDATED. When you get caught you respond with ad hominem nonsense. Post your current wave count for all to see another foolish wave count. Breeze

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext