SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Pokersam's Swamp Drain

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: POKERSAM11/5/2023 12:47:25 PM
   of 4383
 
There is a perplexing situation taking place and no one seems to talk about it.
Here on Si we have two who claim to be experts at applying Elliott Wave Principle.
One goes so far as to claim that no one knows anything but him.
Both of these two hang out together, defend each other, and think that the other is just special.
But the truth is that they do not agree on the SPX wave count. OH, Horror of Horrors
It seems the only thing they agree on is that at every bounce off a low since 4818 in Jan. 2022 would go up to new all-time highs. So far, they have both been 100% wrong about that. You can check it out.
Take the 1327-point decline from 4818 down to 3491.
Da chimp thinks that it is a wave two.
Windy thinks that it is a wave four.
Take the 504-point decline from 4607 down to 4103.
Da chimp thinks it is a wave two.
Windy thinks it is a wave four.
If you know anything about Elliott Wave you know this is a huge difference.

The fact is that only one of them can be right. That would mean that one of them would have to be wrong.
I know that this a huge blow to many that either one could possibly be this wrong.
Which one do you think is wrong? I know it is tough for many to admit the possibility that either one could be wrong but at least one of them MUST be.

In my opinion they are both wrong. With the coming break of 3491 to the downside it will be proven.
Till then, enjoy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext