| | | Another green environmental myth debunked. On forum EV’s were previously debunked when total life cycle environmental impacts of EV’s are compared to ICE vehicles. Currently 65% of energy to charge EV’s comes from fossil fuels.
The green environmental myth debunked here is offshore wind generation.
Article: wattsupwiththat.com
“Often overlooked are the other factors associated with wind energy that actually drive-up emissions. For example, supply chain emissions from constructing offshore wind facilities to replace existing generation facilities will be very large. Supply chain emissions include those arising from all the steps required to create an offshore wind facility: mining and processing the necessary metals and minerals, manufacturing components, constructing turbines and substations on site, and operating, maintaining, replacing and ultimately decommissioning and landfilling worn out, damaged and obsolete equipment. They also include the myriad transportation steps along the way, via ship or truck.”
Reasons for debunking offshore wind energy very similar to debunking EV’s. Life cycle environmental impacts of green energy compared to fossil fuel alternatives when compared “honestly” do not pan out.
Oops, almost forgot, wind energy kills millions of birds and I like birds.
****
The Polluter Elites:
The very people flying to Davos annually on their private jets are responsible for the majority of environmental pollution. The globalists are the “ polluter elites” who want to implement prohibitions on consumption for the masses. The Guardian recently reported that the top 1% produce more carbon emissions than the poorest 66%. The climate change agenda is purely a control tactic, control over our tax spending, energy and food consumption, and freedom of movement. The very people preaching that we must abandon our way of life to save the world KNOW that it is a sham.
sham.
The Guardian partnered with Oxfam, the Stockholm Environment Institute, for “The Great Carbon Divide” study. As of 2019, the top 1% were responsible for 5.9bn tonnes of CO2 emmissions or 16% of all emissions. “The report found it would take about 1,500 years for someone in the bottom 99% to produce as much carbon as the richest billionaires do in a year,” the article notes. “This elite also wield enormous political power by owning media organizations and social networks, hiring advertising and PR agencies and lobbyists, and mixing socially with senior politicians, who are often members of the richest 1%,” the report stated. Furthermore, 25% of Congress owns stocks in fossil fuels worth between $33 million and $93 million.
So the very people who want to ban gas stoves, kill off livestock, end private car ownership, and force the public to consume insects are the same people responsible for these so-called deadly carbon emissions.
Take Jeff Bezos. He owns the Washington Post and can adjust the public narrative as billions yield untold power. He had a bridge deconstructed so that his mega yacht could push through, and he owns numerous jets, yachts, you name it. Yet he also pledges millions each year to support the climate change agenda geared toward punishing the average person for weather patterns. His paper publishes articles warning of the coming end of the world due to the Great Unwashed simply existing. Worse still, the corporations these polluter elites own are responsible for more CO2 emissions than any amount the average person could expend in their lifetimes.
Rules for thee, but not for me. Hence it is absolutely ridiculous that there is current legislation in place aimed at limiting our energy and food consumption that was written by the very people responsible for their proclaimed crisis. armstrongeconomics.com
|
|
