Going forward to improve my swing trading while still keeping things as simple as possible I will be using the $NASI to help solidify real changes in market direction for the NASDAQ. Even using this it is impossible to 100% nail trend changes. Sometimes I will be early even following this chart as I was with my September entries. That worked out fine but boy did I ever sell too soon. The $NYSI turned today. The $NASI has not yet. Disussion from StockCharts below my own chart:
 
  
   
  Introduction     Developed by Sherman and Marian McClellan, the McClellan Summation Index is a breadth indicator derived from the  McClellan Oscillator,  which is a breadth indicator based on Net Advances (advancing issues  less declining issues). The Summation Index is simply a running total of  the McClellan Oscillator values. Even though it is called a Summation  Index, the indicator is really an oscillator that fluctuates above and  below the zero line. As such, signals can be derived from  bullish/bearish divergences, directional movement and centerline  crossovers. A moving average can also be applied to identify upturns and  downturns. 
       Calculation   Previous day's Summation Index* + current day McClellan Oscillator  * The very first Summation Index is simply the value of the McClellan Oscillator.     
     StockCharts.com provides two options for the McClellan Summation Index:  unadjusted and ratio-adjusted. Net Advances is the base indicator used  to calculate the McClellan Oscillator (and, by extension, the Summation  Index); it is derived from the number of advancing issues less the  number of declining issues. This number is used to calculate the  “traditional” Summation Index. Ratio-adjusted Net Advances equals Net  Advances divided by advances plus declines. This shows Net Advances  relative to the total, which makes it possible to compare values over a  long period of time. This article focuses on the Ratio-adjusted  Summation Index. See the  McClellan Oscillator article for more details on ratio-adjusted Net Advances. 
       Interpretation     The Summation Index rises when the McClellan Oscillator is positive and  falls when the McClellan Oscillator is negative. Extended positive  numbers in the McClellan Oscillator cause the Summation Index to trend  higher. Conversely, extended negative readings cause the Summation Index  to trend lower. 
     Because of its cumulative nature, the Summation Index is a slower  version of the McClellan Oscillator. The index crosses the zero line  fewer times, forms divergences less often and produces fewer signals in  general. Whereas the McClellan Oscillator can be used for short-term and  medium-term timing, the Summation Index is generally used for  medium-term and long-term timing. 
     There are three basic signals. First, the Summation Index generally  favors the bulls when positive and the bears when negative. Second,  chartists can look for bullish and bearish divergences to anticipate  reversals. Third, chartists can identify directional movement to define a  bullish or bearish bias. 
       Nasdaq Negative Bias     Before looking at specific signals, note that the Nasdaq Summation Index  has a long-term downward bias. This is because the Nasdaq AD Line also  has a long-term downward bias. This bias stems from listing requirements  that are not as stringent as NYSE. The Nasdaq is full of upstarts in  industries ranging from biotech to technology to alternative energy.  There may be big upside potential, but there is also a risk of absolute  failure and delisting. Stocks trend lower as failure becomes an option.  Companies that fail are ultimately removed from the index, but their  negative effect on these breadth indicators remains. 
       
       
     This negative bias does not affect short-term or medium-term movements,  but it is clearly visible on long-term charts. The charts above show the  Nasdaq Summation Index ($NASI) and the NYSE Summation Index ($NYSI)  from August 2002 until August 2010 (eight years). Notice how the Nasdaq  moved higher from 2003 until 2007. Despite a multi-year uptrend in the  Nasdaq, the Nasdaq Summation Index spent more time in negative territory  and the Nasdaq AD Line trended lower. The NY Composite also moved  higher from 2003 until 2007. In contrast to the Nasdaq version, the NYSE  Summation Index spent more time in positive territory and the NYSE AD  Line trended higher the entire time (green trend line). 
       Positive vs. Negative     Like many  momentum oscillators,  the Summation Index provides a bullish or bearish bias when it is above  or below its center line (zero). This is logical because the glass is  half full when positive and half empty when negative. The Summation  Index will be positive when the McClellan Oscillator has been largely  positive for an extended period of time. It takes more than one  positive/negative reading to push the Summation Index into  positive/negative territory. In fact, it usually takes several positive  readings to push the Summation Index into positive territory and keep it  in positive territory. This is why the Summation Index is better suited  for medium-term or long-term analysis. 
     The chart below shows the NYSE Summation Index with the NY Composite.  The red highlights show when the indicator moved into negative territory  and remained negative. Sustained negative values from June to December  2008 coincided with an extended downtrend in the NY Composite.  Conversely, extended positive values from April to May 2009 coincided  with a sustained uptrend in the NY Composite. Like ALL indicators, the  Summation Index is not perfect. There will be whipsaws or periods when  zero line crossovers do not last long. 
       
     Chartists can also tweak the positive and negative values required for a  bullish or bearish bias. The next chart shows the same time period for  the NYSE Summation Index and NY Composite. Instead of the zero line, the  bullish threshold is set at +500 and the bearish threshold is set at  -500. A long-term bull signal is triggered when the Summation Index  moves above +500 and remains valid until the index moves below -500.  Similarly, a long-term bear signal is triggered when the Summation Index  moves below -500 and remains valid until the index moves above +500.  Instead of 10 signals in three years using the zero cross, there were  only two signals using the +500/-500 cross. The Summation Index captured  the long downtrend from August 2008 until April 2009 and the long  uptrend from April 2009 until July 2010 (and counting). Notice how the  area between 300 and 500 acted as resistance in 2007 and 2008 (blue  arrows). Similarly, the -300 to -500 area acted as support in June 2010. 
       
       Directional Movement     A  moving average  can be applied to the Summation Index to identify upturns and  downturns. The length of the moving average depends on your trading or  investing style and timeframe. A short moving average (5-days) will  generate quicker signals, but there will be more whipsaws. A longer  moving average (20-days) will lag a bit and there will be fewer  whipsaws. It is the eternal tradeoff in technical analysis. More speed  means more whipsaws. Less speed reduces whipsaws at the expense of later  entries. 
     The chart below shows the NYSE Summation Index with a 20-day SMA (pink).  Even with this medium-term moving average, there are still plenty of  signals and turns. Some signals were great, some were not and some  produced whipsaws. The orange areas highlight whipsaws when there were  three moving average crosses within a relatively short timeframe. 
       
       Divergences     Bullish and bearish divergences in the Summation Index can help  foreshadow reversals in the underlying index. However, not all  divergences result in reversals or extended moves. The key, as always,  is to separate robust divergences from weak divergences. A  bullish divergence  occurs when the Summation Index forms a higher low and the index forms a  lower low. Even though the underlying index moved to new lows, the  higher low in the Summation Index shows improving breadth. A bearish  divergence forms when the Summation Index records a lower high and the  index forges a higher high. Even though the underlying index moved to a  new high, the Summation Index failed to exceed its prior high and showed  deteriorating breadth. 
     Chartists should attempt to differentiate between small insignificant  divergences and larger robust divergences. In addition, bearish  divergences in a strong uptrend are more likely to fail - as are bullish  divergences in a strong downtrend. Shallow divergences that form over a  few weeks are more suspect than steep divergences that form over 1-4  months. 
     The chart below shows the Nasdaq Summation Index with the Nasdaq. There  were three bullish divergences in the first half of the chart and four  bearish divergences in the second half. A 20-day SMA was added to  confirm a subsequent movement in the direction of the divergences. For  example, the vertical green lines show the Summation Index moving above  the 20-day SMA after a bullish divergence. Except for the last bullish  divergence, the bearish divergences were steeper and covered longer  timeframes. Also, notice that the bullish divergences occurred during a  strong uptrend. These divergences did hint at short pullbacks within  this uptrend, but they did not foreshadow an extended decline or a major  reversal. 
       
       Conclusions     While the McClellan Oscillator puts a little  momentum  into the AD Line, the Summation Index takes a little out by slowing  down the oscillator. The Summation Index is also quite a few steps  removed from the original indicator, which is Net Advances. In other  words, it takes three separate calculations to produce Summation Index  values. The first derivatives (steps) are the 19-day EMA of Net Advances  and 39-day EMA of Net Advances. The second derivative is the McClellan  Oscillator, which is the 19-day EMA of Net Advances less the 39-day EMA  of Net Advances. The third derivative is the Summation Index, which is a  cumulative McClellan Oscillator. Each additional calculation changes  Net Advances from its original form. This is not always bad, but  chartists should keep this in mind when comparing the Summation Index  with the corresponding index, the Nasdaq or the NY Composite. As with  all indicators, Summation Index signals should be confirmed with other  indicators or technical analysis techniques. 
       SharpCharts     SharpCharts users can plot the Ratio-Adjusted Summation Index for the  NYSE ($NYSI) or the Nasdaq ($NASI). The traditional (unadjusted)  Summation Index symbols are $NYSIT and $NASIT, respectively. These  indicators can be shown in the main chart window or in indicator windows  above and below. The example below shows the Summation Index as a  “line” plot in the main chart window with the underlying index behind  it. This makes it easy to compare turns in the indicator with turns in  the index. A 20-day SMA was added to the Summation Index to identify  turns.  Click here for a live example. 
       
     The Summation Index was also added as an indicator using the “Histogram”  format. This makes it easy to identify crosses above and below the zero  line. The underlying index (Nasdaq) is also shown in the lower window  for comparison. 
                                                                              
   Outline       
                                                                                                                              
   |