ALE/TSE Sleemans Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ALE/TSE Sleemans

ALE 67.32

0.0%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Korven who wrote (63)	2/17/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: paul s.	Read Replies (1) of 272

John: All B.S. aside, for UCB to be charging a premium in ridiculous. There is no doubt that "quality" (not perceived but REAL) has no bearing on the price. Having said that, I'm starting to think that Sleeman needs to have a few premium money makers in its line up, and it may be best to keep a couple where they make sense operationally (enough volume to warrant Sleeman continuing). If they can continue to get people to pay more for those brands, then more power to them, since Sleemans can make it cheaper (and better)than UCB ever could. They can market under separate name, because people have short memories and will forget Sleeman makes them in a couple of months, and it could be just business as usual for the UCB brands after the takeover... Just rambling I guess... paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next