SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (282354)4/5/2024 12:15:00 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Thomas M.

  Read Replies (4) of 359906
 
I have not argued it was her fault. I've argued it didn't happen, and that even the allegation that is happened is an absurdity.

>> Given that she told at least one person at the time it was rape, that sort of blows a couple of your theories out of the water.

So, it counts when it is this NY downtown slut, but when it was Juanita Broaderick she is not believed because she was a woman with no history of loose behavior facing off with Bill Clinton. After the statute of limitations had tolled years ago.

THE WOMAN CLEARLY GOT THE ENTIRE SCENARIO FROM AN EPISOIDE OF LAW & ORDER SVU.

How do you Dems justify looking away from the obvious truth?

There is no plausible way this alleged meetup occurred in the same place, time, floor, and dressing room as she had seen in an episode of Law & Order. There is simply no way this happened unless she sold the story line to the makers of the TV series.

How do you [Dems] write that off as though it doesn't destroy her entire story?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News