SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451627)4/11/2024 5:52:48 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) of 1571324
 
>> Again, it's semantics.

It isn't mere semantics. There is some reason two jurors said, "Hell no. There was no rape." We cannot know why they said it, but it is fair to assume they did not agree there was a rape or penetration -- since any type of penetration would have been rape.

They took it into a far more nebulous realm of "sexual touching". WTF does that even mean? We know only that it DOES NOT encompass any form of penetration, or it would have been rape.

This was a negotiated finding -- meaning, that there was no meeting of the minds among jurors and beyond that we cannot ascertain exactly WHAT it means. For example, those two jurors MIGHT believe that Trump did nothing, but ought to have to pay just because. We can't know that -- because the one thing we do know is they didn't agree there was penetration.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News