Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (1451702)	4/12/2024 12:22:41 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Eric pocotrader Read Replies (3) of 1571688

Inode, One, is there must be evidence, which she did not produce. 12 jurors disagree with you. Of course, I'm sure the jury was full of people who simply H8D Trump, AMIRITE? Speaking of which, WTF was Trump's lawyers doing, if they allowed all of these Trump H8Rs onto the jury during the selection process? But it is important to keep in mind that humans don't always remember things that well Carroll had two witnesses that corroborated under oath her story close to the time when it happened. Carroll also produced evidence that contradicted Trump's story that he never met her. Trump's own deposition also worked against him. There's a reason why the 5th amendment exists. All of the above contributed to Carroll being the more believable of the two. All of the above met the civil standard of "preponderance of the evidence." The only valid argument you might have would be the constitutionality of NY's Adult Survivor's Act, which I'm sure will be argued on appeal. But don't for one second think that Carroll produced no evidence, because that simply isn't true. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next