Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Broken_Clock

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1451731)	4/12/2024 1:56:48 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 1571621

>> Widdle donny was tried by a jury which decided he assaulted her and defamed her. The jury NEGOTIATED as to what it claimed he actually did. But there was no evidence of it. It was not a jury of his peers. And even the jury couldn't decide anything, two wanted to find him not liable and clearly were talked into the lesser claim of "sexual touching" -- which does NOT include penetration or constitute rape. It is complicated for you I'm sure. When you cannot get a jury to agree on what happened, you can't really claim the worst of the charges happened. And standards of evidence as well a lowered standard of finding the defendant responsible (not guilty, in any case) is put out solely to confuse the public and cause harm to the defendant because nothing else will do. They couldn't get him for any crime, they went after him for money and found a judge who would break the rules to hit him for 100M.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next