SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1452052)4/13/2024 10:23:13 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1571601
 
No. If it is done without case t it would be potentially criminal.

However, during the course of sexual relations digital penetration occurs but the female rejects after digital penetration but before vaginal penetration. Can the digital penetration then be found to have been Criminal?

Has a crime been committed? It has not.

Just the fact that digital penetration occurred it is not automatically criminal and a subsequent inter course still becomes a rape.

These are complex interactions and the criminal acts are, apparently, rape and generic sexual touching. That could mean anything that an unscrupulous woman or one with a poor memory wants it to me.

It is actually quite sick they way it is implemented.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News