Robert:
As I understand it, the following 2 differences are the big ones for me:
1. - W/ Iridium, the core technology (TDMA) is located in the satellites, and therefore is basically (hardware side) fixed for the life of the product. In Globalstar, the technology (CDMA) is ground based, and the satellites are used to reflect signals only (the "Bent Pipe" terminology). In the event of new technologies, Globalstar will be able to adapt, Iridium may not.
2. The Iridium system is completely satellite based. That is, you will contract with, and use only Iridiums system. Since they send the signals from satellite to satellite around the world, there will be a noticeable delay in voice transmissions. Globalstar on the other hand, is designed to work in concert w/ other wireless carriers. You will have an account with your wireless carrier, and use a Globalstar handset. Your primary usage will be digital w/ your carrier, secondary will be analog while roaming, and lastly if there is no cellular signal, your call will go through the satellite. But the satellite bounces the signal right back to earth, and uses land lines to complete the call, thereby avoiding any delay.
I think if you research back far enough, you will find that Iridium has changed their original strategy. They were originally going to sell premium phones ($3,000 range) and premium service ($3/minute) to premium travelers. They thought they could use the phones anywhere in the world, including and especially in buildings. But the initial testing showed that in building penetrations was too week, so they changed their strategy, to one more in line with what Globalstar is doing. But because their network costs almost twice as much, and they are not partnering with carriers, their service and equipment will still be very expensive, especially as compared to Globalstars.
Good Luck to All! |