| | | Broken Cuck, The only debate is how many times your propaganda has been proven dead wrong. You haven't proven anything, as usual.
There's a reason why you won't link to the original post, because if you did, you (and anyone else with a drop of intellectual honesty) would realize just how accurate I was:
Message 34167185
So in terms of sheer magnitude, a few hundred Western tanks aren't going to mean much. I knew from the get-go that 200 tanks won't mean much. I was right then, and I'm right today.
However, I did make a prediction that didn't come true ...
However, the pipeline of Western military assistance is widening. Sending 31 M1 Abrams tanks doesn't sound like all that much, UNTIL you recognize just how complicated the logistics are. That M1 tank is expensive to fuel, operate, and maintain. The supply chain network needs to be set up, along with maintenance crews, parts, and all the associated training. So in short, the 31 M1 tanks is just the start. The setup of the pipeline is the key here. After the 31 tanks are sent, it would become much easier for America to send more if needed. What I didn't anticipate was MAGA getting a firm grip on Speaker Mike's Johnson. And it took months before he could break that grasp.
As for whether the U.S. will send more tanks to Ukraine, I really doubt it now, at least for this year. Bradleys, HIMARS, JDAMs, and our own versions of glide bombs (if we can get them working, which for some reason we can't) will be given priority over tanks. There probably won't be another Ukrainian counteroffensive for some time.
As for "proving me wrong," keep trying. I welcome the challenge, especially from PooTin cucks like you ...
Tenchusatsu |
|
