SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (284783)5/2/2024 6:19:45 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Wharf Rat

   of 358465
 
The system failed miserably. We know that.

No we don't. You might think you do, but you. like always, are mistaken. Much of what you "know" is made up bullshit.

You cannot have individuals making contributions to election and I fluencing, in any way, the grant process.

Sure you can. If the grantor has certain conditions and the grantee accepts them, then that is ok. But there is no evidence that happened in 2020. It can't be hard to find out what the original requirements for the grant proposals were. Have you seen any? Or are you just making shit up as you are prone to do? Grants are a process. You can't look at the final product and have any insight into that process. The fact that the final grant has some language as to how the money is spent isn't unusual. In fact, it is common. Part of the fraud prevention process you seem to be convinced never happens. I doubt if there is any grant that hands over money without any agreement as to what it is to be spent on. The grantee stipulates how much and what for. There might be some negotiation about certain items and then the final grant documents those items. This has been explained to you. You keep ignoring that because you want to connect a certain dot, even if it doesn't apply. You want those grants to be nefarious and have made up a bunch of shit to make it fit. Like you are prone to do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext