| | | The ONLY reason why the details are relevant is, like you said, "Donny boy" denies everything.
Hence simply stating that a sexual encounter took place isn't enough, for "Donny boy" will just deny deny deny like he always does.
The pron star has to give details, and her story needs to be plausible, so that the jury can be convinced that "Donny boy" is lying.
And even in the court of public opinion, you know the story is plausible because you now see the Trump supporters saying, "I don't care who Trump has sex with."
In other words, they too don't believe Trump's denials, but they're fine with that.
Like Bill Clinton, who the Democrats claim didn't lie because "Anyone would lie about getting a blowjob," the Trump supports will claim that Trump didn't lie because "Anyone would lie about banging a pron star for money, then paying her to STFU about it."
Did Dems in the Clinton days realize what they were making acceptable for Presidents? |
|
