SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1458052)5/21/2024 5:52:54 PM
From: Bill2 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
longz

  Read Replies (1) of 1570553
 
I think you are missing the part where the prosecution didn't prove #1, even if you think it's a crime.

There was no witness who said it wasn't a legal fee, even though it was "billed" by Cohen as such. The prosecutors did not offer a CPA or any expert witness to state for the record that it wasn't a legal fee.

Also, there was no witness who testified that Trump authorized how the payment was classified on the books. Trump didn't do it, obviously, and no witness said he directed how it should be accounted for.

So no... you are 100% wrong on the facts and law on item #1.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News