SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1461290)6/7/2024 6:19:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (2) of 1573433
 
Brumar,
You say "an eye for an eye" was only to protect Jews but then you chicken out of explaining that.
To be sure, I think Joachim was talking about "turn the other cheek," not "eye for an eye."

Doesn't matter, though. Joachim is a heretic who contradicts himself all the time.

He claims "eye for an eye" is a Christian concept but can't back it up with New Testament scripture.

He openly declares that he doesn't follow the Old Testament, even though every single Christian denomination in the world has declared both the Old and the New Testaments to be canon.

And now he comes up with a lame excuse for not following one of Jesus' most powerful, unique, and identifiable commands, namely "turn the other cheek."

It is one of the most well-known commands from Jesus' Sermon on the Mount. It was revolutionary at the time, and still is even 2000 years later.

To reject it is to basically reject Jesus himself.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News