Dozer, first I remind ourselves that most happenings reported by Bloomberg edges on truth as observed, but enough reports are deliberately false, placed to distract us, and one good and recurring example being anything to do with <<China rice pellet-sized spy chip Amazon Apple Ingram Micro>>, as well as anything to do with <<China missiles filled with water, not fuel: US intelligence Xi seeking to root out corruption, prepare military for combat>>
as followups, the spy chip stories just died a natural death per my observations here Message 34536509
... Neo-people tend to just make up stuff and keep repeating them, then quoting each other in echo chamber, believed by cretins, morons, dullards, ... , and knaves, and and and, and oh, wastrels ... Bloomberg first broke both 'stories', re rice pellet spy chips, and watery rockets
bloomberg.com
China missiles filled with water, not fuel: US intelligence Esteemed CSIS referencing Bloomberg, predictably, and so went the daisy of expert reports
csis.org
China’s Waterlogged Missiles Don’t Matter rfa.org
China's air force 'burned missile fuel to make hotpot': ex-officer and the watery rocket story exposed here
asiatimes.com
Water in Chinese missiles’ tanks is a fake story ... According to what Bloomberg News describes as a US intelligence report, Chinese authorities discovered that some of their missiles’ fuel tanks were filled with water – and that this was a marquee example of corruption whose unraveling led to Chinese President Xi’s recent military purge. Bloomberg reported that it got the information from unnamed people who were “familiar with” a US intelligence assessment and that those US sources also said that new Xinjiang missile field silos were fitted with lids that were not installed properly and would not work – taken as another example of corruption. Pentagon officials and “experts” are telling the press that the import of the twin tales is that China is weak and cannot fight. Yet the sources “familiar with” the intelligence say they cannot validate the information they provided Bloomberg. The leaked “intelligence” that Bloomberg cites as its ultimate source leads inexorably to major questions. Under close examination the claims cited in the report seem to be fake. |
