Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1462529)	6/13/2024 11:59:26 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Read Replies (1) of 1572712

Broken Cuck, I don't even think that graph is accurate. It indicates that royalty payments from the years between 2009 and 2020 averaged $1M a year. But according to OpenTheBooks.com, $134M in royalty payments were paid between the years of 2009 and 2014: perma.cc Recently, our organization at OpenTheBooks.com forced NIH to disclose over 22,100 royalty payments totaling nearly $134 million paid to the agency and nearly 1,700 NIH scientists. These payments occurred during the most recently available period (September 2009 – September 2014). Now OpenTheBooks.com is contradicting their own data in order to come up with that sensationalist graph. And even then, what does the graph prove exactly? That the NIH is oh-so-corrupt? That the surge in royalty payments is bad bad bad despite the very real need for pharmaceutical research during the pandemic? Don't bother answering the question, Broken Cuck. I already know those questions are five pay grades above your level. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next