Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 173.20

-3.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tero kuittinen who wrote (8657)	2/19/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: Ramsey Su	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Tero, a few questions. Your posts seem to imply that W-CDMA is a "QCOM not welcomed" standard, except for a few patents that QCOM holds. How dare QCOM be asking 2-5% fro their IPRs. Is it possible that while all the debates are going on, which could last years, QCOM is developing a CDMA based solution? qdog, is it technically possible to have a path from CDMA/GSM overlay then to W-CDMA? If yes, who would be in a better place than QCOM to come up with the solution? Further more, by the year 2000, the US cellular market is expected to be 80 million subscribers. What is the total number of subscribers for all the European countries combined? The battle for new markets are not going to be 3G but WLL. A combination of fixed wireless and roaming wireless should attract far more subscribers than a phone that can down load a full length video. ERICY and Nokia are good companies but ERICY's style of trying to shut out QCOM by any means possible can only work in medieval Europe and not the new world. Ramsey

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next