SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Eric
pocotrader
To: Bill who wrote (1470880)7/22/2024 1:05:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 1576553
 
Bill,
Take time to read the judge’s correct decision and the statement by a justice of the Supreme Court that preceded it.
First of all, I noticed that you didn't name the Supreme Court justice who wrote that statement. It was Clarence Thomas.

I think you were intentionally being obscure because you knew Thomas' statement was a bit "sus."

And second, I already read the decisions. Both Cannon and Thomas completely ignored precedent and came up with new interpretations that ignored U.S. vs. Nixon.

If you think that will survive appeal, you are mistaken.

But then again, I don't think you give a Brandon about how weak Cannon's argument was, as long as you can delay the prosecution of this case.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News