SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dj55 who wrote (294422)7/28/2024 12:14:36 AM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) of 353990
 
That is just demonstrably false.
It isn't "demonstrably false". I've demonstrated time and again that it was true, but we don't agree on the criteria for referring to something as election theft so that's that.

My opinion is that election theft is "dishonesty, cheating or fraud in the election process". By my definition, there was so much election theft in 2020 it is difficult to imagine it was even as close as it was. Trump should won just by virtue of the count not being one-sided. I mean, fewer than 100K votes were involved, I don't remember the precise number but it wasn't many. And clearly, more than that number were stolen in the states where it did change the outcome.

I'm not going to discuss this optic further with you as the history is in this thread for you to see and it would just be a waste of time. I've never seen a Democrat accept that the election was stolen and you're not going to be the first.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News