SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longz
To: Lane3 who wrote (294467)7/28/2024 3:23:00 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 353904
 
As far as I can tell, the brief clip of Vance that was posted is not useful in addressing the question at hand because we cannot ascertain surrounding context.

The article, however, made it analytically clear that Vance's position is that juggling husbands may ameliorate one kid's problem while leaving another kid with the same or worse problem after a change in spouses has occurred. So, you end up with not one damaged child, but two or more.

And Vance is correct -- his argument was not in defense of the violence; it was simply a statement of fact that divorces simply rejiggers the problem, it does not solve it and likely ends in more violence overall.

I believe his is likely eyewitness testimony, so it is more credible than inferences draw from the question.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News