SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (294473)7/28/2024 8:17:37 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) of 353950
 
Vance is the one who made the matter a big deal with the notion that non-breeding is not only bad but a problem that needs to be fixed. It reeks with disrespect and is threatening.

I may have missed the big picture somewhere, but my impression is that he was addressing the situation that occurs after children are born and violence occurs, what to do about it. The debate was whether more harm was done by staying together or the family splitting up.

This is something I admit to having zero personal experience with. But it seems to me a cogent argument is to try to solve the problem, rather than leave children fatherless (or motherless, if that is the case) and send the offending parent off to serially offend against other family units. The quantity of harm done overall may be minimized finding a way to deal with the problem within the family versus turning the trouble-maker loose on other families.

I would argue that he, as a victim, probably ought to be listened to on this topic. While it is possible his view is jaundiced, it is also possible it is far deeper than most of those who would think about it in the context of solutions.

Obviously, if an victim determines it is time to go, that is the victim's decision. I don't think he argued against that.

Vance is the one who made the matter a big deal with the notion that non-breeding is not only bad but a problem that needs to be fixed. It reeks with disrespect and is threatening.
I don't believe he suggested that with the "cat ladies" comment. It would probably be better if he hadn't said it but it isn't something I'd get balled up about.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News