Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Fitzhughlaw who wrote (62786)	8/7/2024 6:44:56 PM
From: allatwwk	5 Recommendations Recommended By diaperdaddy jhcimmu KeeptheFaith rodneyh07 suite2321 of 63305

will always be grateful to Fitz for helping us understand all the complexities around IMMU. I also, was among the ones he described as "too loose with language". One thing I got out of it all was an appreciation for how judges (independent of their specific title) were able to allow things to play out. My impatience made sense to me, but the process played out smartly. In the IMMU case, my hindsight evaluation was the judge (forget his exact title) allowed the case to flow into a legal cul-de-sac where Doc and Cindy had no way out. When it got there, it ended. I am curious about SLAPP My sense is these laws were largely designed to stop the big/powerful from intimidating and pushing around the small/weak. For example, entities with deep pockets forcing those without deep pockets to deal in areas where deep pockets are necessary. I just don't see SAVA as big/powerful, nor do I see the shorts as small/weak. I'd like to better understand this, not just with SAVA, but in broader strokes.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next