SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rentech(RTK) - gas-to-liquids and cleaner fuel
RTK 0.200+5.3%Oct 13 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Andrew H who wrote (1267)2/19/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) of 14347
 
Andrew, I have reread very carefully the 10QSB. There are $2,000,000 of the preferred A and a "possible" additional $8,000,000 of the Preferred B. The preferred A have a ceiling of the last 10 trading days prior to the sales of the convertible and are absolutely floorless (actually 17.5% discount to the last 5 days trading closing bid). The B, apparently have no ceiling (or at least none is mentioned in the 10QSB) but are just as floorless as the preferred A. There might be a covenant forbidding arbitrage in the common stock against these preferred, but if such exists, it would be a good idea to bring the text to the thread, since the 10QSB contains no language forbidding the engagement by the holders of the preferred in arbitrage activities involving the commons. So far, I have seen only one case where floorless have an anti arbitrage covenant (AIPN). I wish this covenant would be used more often. It does not prevent completely the holders of the floorless shorting (they can use off shore accounts) but it limits their agility in mounting "short raids" on the stock prior to their intended conversion.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext