>> Because the status quo ante sucked, too. She would have said, instead, damn Trump for killing that legislation that would have helped pending comprehensive immigration reform.
So, what was the objective when Biden opened the border? Trump had it working pretty well, not perfect, but he had contained the border problem encountered during his administration.
Then, Biden comes in and just undoes everything, essentially inviting a rush of illegal immigration from all over the world. Then he puts Harris in charge, and she literally does nothing at all curtail the problem.
In effect, they made us borderless in the south and welcomed everyone to come in, illegally if they wished. I have never been able to understand the motivation for it.
Why do you think Biden and Harris did that?
Isn't the status quo ante better than they took us? If not, then what is the benefit that offsets the pretty massive damage it has caused? |
