Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Riley G who wrote (42116)	2/20/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 55532

To: +Pugs (42113 ) From: +Riley G Wednesday, Feb 18 1998 11:05PM EST Reply # of 42164 I think the autopsies for the short sellers may be in effect starting tomorrow! ********** OOooppss!!! There ya go again.. trying to think again... <wink> Waited all day for something to happen to RMIL, to no avail. Btw Riley.... I hate to bring up the obviously sore subject of the suspect certificate that you once had posted on your website. However, a good buddy of mine with considerable knowledge of discerning alterations in images just sent me his analysis of that .JPG image. (He designs OCR software... etc) **************************************** Ron after careful processing I have determined the type in the data is not the same as the other type. signatures are consistent with the jpg compression lossy noise. the name and number of shares are different from that of the date. they are slightly darker and the noise is inconsistent with the surroundings. there may be a slight difference due to the water mark and the eagle in the background from the noise however that would have little effect on the black and blue filters showing a slight darker type in the name and number of shares. definitely questionable document number 94420 ******** So Riley... how did my buddy do?? He feels pretty confident about the certificate number, but I told him that none of this is conclusive without your original certificate to compare it to. (but that would defeat the entire purpose of this excercise, wouldn't it... :0) Regards, Ron

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next