SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longz
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1490276)10/2/2024 2:49:28 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1571053
 
>> It's a trade-off between economic activity and saving lives,

Assuming, arguendo, that were an element of it, it still doesn't it make acceptable what was done. And I think you're "leadership" proved it in person when they ignored their own rules.

But my point is that before that claim holds water, there must be science showing strong proof of not just correlation, but that Cali's ranking in deaths per capital was specifically CAUSED by these rules. You can believe it, and that is fine. But there really isn't any convincing proof of it (although there are bogus "studies" that support the claim).

Statistically and scientifically the claim doesn't hold water. More importantly, the action makes no sense. You don't destroy the life blood of your state (or nation) by forcing companies to stop operating. Imagine if you business were shut down today and how it might affect your entire life going forward. Just think about that a little bit. Would you STILL support it?

If I had owned a business in Cali at that time, I would have packed up and left for good. It is clearly far too dangerous for any business to operate there, and certainly to be homed there.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext