I can tell you this with assurance since I know plenty of people at Facebook, from legal to marketing to engineering. They tell me that it is NOT in Facebook's fiduciary interest to be oh-so-biased to the left. I certainly wouldn't argue with the point you're making, but I do argue with the one you're TRYING to make. But if you're trying to claim it didn't happen, that is not a supportable claim at all. If that is your point, we know the facts. Facebook, Twitter, and other
There is little doubt Zuck is trying to atone for the mistake he made in 2020. He has made it publicly clear that he will not be doing what he did again (i.e., participating in the theft of the 2020 election). And maybe I'm a fool, but I believe him.
I think he saw it as "payback" for Cambridge Analytica, which is silly. He thought he could help even the score. But now, he says he's done with all that. I believe him: He understood that he went too far. That SOB may be voting Trump this year after the disaster Dems have been for the last four!
Of course, he wasn't neck deep in working with FBI & others like Twitter was; that was a terrible thing, and the reason only free speech is tolerable. If you don't have free speech, you have what we had for the 2020 election, which were lies, damned lies, and more damned lies -- all under the watchful eyes of the Deep State who wanted Trump gone.
Of course, now the process has been outlawed in most states, so that we don't have worry about this time. But Dems are gonna cheat. It is what they've always done and that isn't about to change. Whether it is Donna Brazille getting the questions before the debate on ABC, or ALL TV media trying to "fact check" by lying as Leslie Stahl did on 60 Minutes, or in the hateful means of George Stephanopolous on ABC. It was sick, but not helpful to your cause.
So don't give me this bullshit over the government forcing Twitter employees to censor content. If anything, social media execs like Zuckerberg and Dorsey were trying to RESTRAIN their employees from going full-tilt left. You clearly have not read the reporting of Matt Taibii and others on this subject. These are things there is absolutely zero doubt about. These scumbags who were doing the editing at Twitter were on the payroll; the names were named. It isn't like this is some kind of speculation.
Perhaps one of your problems here is that you simply don't know what the facts are. Have you even read the damned articles? |