>> You really believe that, without Musk's $44B purchase of Twitter, the First Amendment would have been repealed or rendered powerless.
The First Amendment? Yes, it continues to be in serious danger.
John Kerry publicly stated that the in regard to "disinformation", "the First Amendment is a 'major block' to the ability to just hammer it out of existence." Imagine that. If John Kerry classifies something Ten said as "disinformation", we could just hammer it out of existence.
Sort of like Stalin, RIGHT?
When Dave Chapellte made hilarious comedy on the "Alphabet People", he would hammer THAT out, too, wouldn't he?
Then, following his comment Hillary Clinton claimed social media companies "must moderate content" or 'we lose total control".
WTF does that mean?
I just think you may be taking the Bill of Rights un-seriously. You shouldn't do that. Once lost, there isn't a clear way forward to getting them back.
---
Musk allowed in great, first-rate journalists to investigate what happened, and yes, sunshine is the greatest disinfectant. As a result, people will go there as a source of truth. By "truth" I mean unadulterated by the opinion of a Zuckerberg, an FBI agent who is pushing a government political agenda, a statement from the Politburo whether true or false, or from an operative in Iran or China or anywhere else.
It cannot be killed. It will receive plenty of time to flourish in the truth. As important things should.
It is also important that many people were unaware that institutions in fact lied, and they had their eyes opened by it. You didn't. But you're in California and covered in the muck of the Left Coast.
One day perhaps you'll appreciate it or perhaps you won't. There is no demand that you accept the intervention on your behalf. |
