SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.78+0.7%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (48259)2/20/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: Jim Patterson  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
I have just skimmed some of the posts on the Covington P II.

After Reading Pain Webber's take on INTC's recient forum, I am trying to get a better understanding.

What exactly is the market for Covington. Yes I know it is >$1,00 PC,
But doesn't the P200-233MMX do that allready ?
From what I understand, Covington will preform about equal to P233MMX so why switch ?
For $799 HP's p200mmx is a great deal, and can run anygame out there now. I know that will change over time, but so will the chip @ $799.

Will covington be faster than K6 machines at the same price ?
Will you be able to add Cache later ?

Why not take the P233mmx up to 266 or 300 Mhz ?

If Covington ends up with a premimum because of the Slot one design, then good old Socket 7 will end up rulling the Sub Z.

My understanding is that only Slot 2 will be PC 100.

Last question,
Slot 2 PC 100 P-II, 400-450 replaces the PPro.
It will be 1-2-4-8 chips per system. with 512, 1MB, 2MB Cache /Chip.
This will enable INTC to enter the $1MM server system level.

With the Advent on NT 5 and WolfPack, Is it posible that 10 $ 50,000 systems could have the same capacity Pluss the benifit of redundency,
Make these systems Price prohibitive ?

I know, these $ 1MM machines will challenge the AS 600 market so there will be demand.

Thanks
Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext