|
tonyt, >>...looks like you've been deputized by the spelling/grammer {sic} police <LOL> << Had I been deputized and had I accepted the job, it would be incumbent upon me to inform the threadsters that you don't know how to spell "grammar" { your choice is "grammer"}, "to" { your choice was "too"}, "lowly" { your choice was "lowely"}, "wise" { your choice was "wize"},& "was" { your choice was "waz"}. I'm sure you have by now impressed the threadsters with the multiplicity of your incapabilities. >> So, oh wize one: please explain too us lowely 'threadsters' why there waz a 6.195 pop.<< To complete what would be incumbent upon me, had I accepted the job, it would be my unhappy duty to inform you of your improper use of the colon {:} after "oh wize one". You should have used a comma {,}. Additionally, had I accepted the job, it would have been incumbent upon me to have pointed out to you that you improperly used a comma {,}to separate "not 7% as I stated, however ..." .The correct usage there would have been a semicolon { ;}. Lastly, correct usage requires the usage of quotation marks {"} , not the use of the apostrophe {'}, when indicating a quotation. Bernie. P.S. The reason LGND rose from 14 1/8 to 15 on Friday was the excess of buying pressure over supply at the specific time that the move occurred. |
