Koan, you obviously didn't understand any of the court cases. "You do not have standing" does not mean the evidence that was to be produced was wrong. "But your honour, I have here the knife with his fingerprints on it, his DNA inside the victim, his video of his crime". "Too bad as you don't have standing now get out of here or I'll jail you for contempt of court".
Do you not understand that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence? Do you really think that DementiaJoe10% hiding in his basement really got all time world record votes, exceeding Obama the Great? And all the shutting of counting in the night, continued counting long after time was up, computers that can be twiddled to get any result you want, collection of randomly mailed out voting papers, no signatures, huge incentive, criminal Democrats by the ton .... a laugh.
It's fascinating reading what people write in Cyberspace, and what they say up close and personal. Thank you for providing specimens of how they think, what they think and why they think. It's nice to understand that there really are people out there who think like that. Being God-like, I can see the Fine People Hoax, then watch the experimental subjects fail to understand reality then live in hallucinations for years. People with Stockholm Syndrome, religious fervour etc can't see from the outside = they are inside their little sphere of perception and belief. With my cosmic view and no need to identify as MAGA or Loony Liberal Leftoid etc, I can see the whole.
In my time, I have fallen into the trap of wanting to believe. I ignored faults I could see but the belief in the goal induced me to trivialize the problem. Ooops a daisy = cost me big money in an investment.
I'd bet bigly that the 2020 election was an actual win to Trump, but not a slam dunk. Like the 2024 election was not a slam dunk though convincingly won. A convincing win would be 80% vote one way. That so many people prefer madness is fascinating and scary. I guess about half would choose to launch full scale nuclear war on Russia = "They invaded a sovereign country out of the blue for no reason except Putin wants to take over all of Europe after rebuilding the Soviet Union and taking our freedoms. Also appeasement is a bad word so we all need to go MAD. Russia Russia Russia. And Trump is Putin's pawn. And Trump grabbed all the pussies when women were trying to get away from him. "
In fairness, the average IQ is only 100, and half of them are below that, so it's good that they can even stay alive using welfare. They certainly won't be able to figure out the fine people hoax, or the other dozens of hoaxes.
What's interesting is that highly intelligent people also are delusional all too often. Maybe just as much. Because they have overinflated self-belief whereas dummies know they are likely to be wrong. It usually stems from ignorance and false premises combined with bung ideology combined with identity formation in Stockholm Syndrome relationships. Something like that. I know people personally and ponder how they come by their bung ideas = it's an interesting subject. My own faulty ideas over decades give some insight to the process too. Providing facts and reason one would think they'd like and see the light, but they usually don't. Religious/delusional beliefs are not amenable to reason.
So you go on thinking that Biden won bigly. You believe the fine people hoax. And the many other hoaxes. You believe war on Russia is a great idea. Kamala would have been awesome. More tax and more money down the drain would be wonderful. More jihad invasion would bring excellent diversity. Hunter was a splendid chap, doing wonderful work for Burisma. Heck, he should have been president.
Mqurice |
