I think there was plenty of evidence in J6 and stolen documents cases
We have not seen any such "evidence". At all. There was never one spark of credible evidence produced concerning J6. There were TV shows buying up as many as 9 channels at once, but there was no credible evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part. And they damned sure didn't let in any evidence of what Trump got right, which was most of it.
Don't be gullible. These people, starting with Pelosi, but on down, are outrageously corrupt. She had been trying to bring him down for four years and failed. The entire thing was proved to have been setup, and yet you still don't get it.
So, I don't think you will -- any rational person who witnessed the murder of Ashli Babbitt as it occurred, stopped, at that instant as I did, and thought, "Wait a minute. What the actual fuck is going on here?"
>> , but a corrupt Supreme Court gave him cover. Same in the documents case in Florida with Judge Cannon. Just waiting to see plum he awards her....
Jack Smith knew what the timeline had to look like yet he failed to deliver the goods early enough to bring about an earlier trial. Why do you think that is?
Democrats perfectly designed this entire plan to keep Trump off the campaign trial during the 18 months before the election. For the most part, they did that -- but they didn't anticipate his ability to work hard and late to get around scheduling limitations.
All of these cases, except one (EJC, which amounts to extortion and should be shitcanned if he bothers to make it happen) were never credible. And they knew it.
So, cry yourself a river is you must, but the trials are over and they failed to prevent his re-election.
You just need to swallow hard and get by it; it is challenge you can meet and endorse if you're willing to be honest with yourselves. Best of luck to you. |
