>> The amount of "evidence" linking both Gates and Trump to Epstein's sex crimes are similar, almost identical.
I didn't call gates a Child Molester, although something is weird about it imo:
When initially asked about it by the media, Bill answered very awkwardly, which I'm sure you've seen on TV. It looked bad, but I said, hell, maybe it caught him off-guard.
But when Melinda was asked about it recently, her responses were acerbic, both in their brevity and the mannerism. When I saw that I felt it confirmed my earlier initial take.
And finally, Buffet's abandonment of the Gates Foundation, even though he presented business "reasons", are apparent to anyone. Warren's time is limited, and he made the decision because he does NOT want that association to be a bigger part of his otherwise squeaky clean image than it already is.
So, all things considered, it is far more likely he was involved than Trump, since there is zero evidence Trump was ever involved, or ever would have been. It does not strike me as something Trump would have been involved in. And if he had, someone would know it and certainly would have used it against him politically.
|
