SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (1506996)12/9/2024 2:21:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
Eric

  Read Replies (3) of 1570347
 
Inode,
This is evidence that is reasonably significant against Gates.
None of it is significant. All you did was point out that (a) Bill gave awkward answers, (b) Melinda said things, and (c) Warren Buffett cut the Gates Foundation out of his will.

NONE of that supports the notion that Bill Gates was a child molester.

But ALL of them support my argument that reasonable people consider ANY association with Epstein as extremely toxic.

Yet here you are, condemning Bill Gates for his association but giving Donald Trump a free pass. You're trying to imply that Trump "had limits" that didn't include going after underage girls, but that's utter bullshit.

There is no evidence that the relationship between Trump and Epstein was any different than the relationship between Gates and Epstein.

The ONLY difference is the way Gates' friends treated the relationship vs. Trump's friends.

And that says a lot more about the people that both men hang out with along with their relative moral standards.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext