SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longz
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1507127)12/9/2024 5:48:53 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation   of 1570498
 
None of it is significant. All you did was point out that (a) Bill gave awkward answers, (b) Melinda said things, and (c) Warren Buffett cut the Gates Foundation out of his will.

NONE of that supports the notion that Bill Gates was a child molester.
I would say it "supports" the notion but does not come close to proving it.

But Melinda's divorce was about the Epstein association and not something else. She said that. And her comments when asked direct questions were terse and pointed.

Maybe not "proof" but telling.

From the outset, Buffett's involvement with the Gates Foundation was to be permanent. Withdrawing 100B or whatever it is was not just a disagreement over management style after years of hanging out with Gates. And while he gave some excuses, they really didn't pass muster in my view. Buffett is a pretty direct fellow, but he clearly was prepared to avoid the issue.

I hope time will tell what happened.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News