Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

longz

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1507388)	12/10/2024 12:08:52 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 1570842

>> Anyway, if you MAGA guys have a problem with the Constitutionality of that, you're welcome to take it to the 6-3 Supreme Court. I think there are a ton of problems with that case, but judges don't like to override verdicts, even if they're corrupt outcomes. While this is far from going back to court, it is a steep uphill climb to through out a jury's verdict. However, it is almost certain the constitutionality of the so-called "Adult Survivors Act" -- a temporary law to begin with that has now run it course and is no longer the law, will be one of the several issues. It doesn't even begin to look constitutional in its implementation as a trap for one guy (or actually a few, if that happened). It is hard for me to understand what a statute of limitations is when a local government can just jump up and say, "Well, the statute doesn't apply to your case because it only applied to people accused of acts before and after your case" -- well, that's bullshit. You either have a statute or you don't. Whether the supremes see it that was in another matter.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next