So do you have a different theory?
Do you think there are actually a lot MORE Republican scientists?
How could that be possible given their supply side theory of economics, or their Horatio Alger ideas for cutting social programs (just pull yourself up by your boot straps), or their Laissez Faire theories of economics, or their denial of global warming, or denying evolution, etc.
And where are the smart Republican economic and social theories?
Almost all of our 36 trillion debt, and horrible income inequality, is a result of their supply side,and social theories for cutting taxes on the rich.
<
Message #314108 from Alastair McIntosh at 12/24/2024 9:56:09 AM
More on the PEW poll
Results for the scientist survey are based on 2,533 online interviews conducted from May 1 to June 14, 2009 with members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International.
A sample of 9,998 members was drawn from the AAAS membership list excluding those who were not based in the United States or whose membership type identified them as primary or secondary-level educators.
And the society didn’t just provide Pew with its membership list. “[AAAS Director] Waylon Butler and his colleagues as AAAS were instrumental at constructing the sample of scientists and managing the recruitments of participants for the scientist survey,” says the Pew report.
This is important, because the AAAS is (as its name suggests) a political advocacy group. And, according to its website, the top issues it advocates for are climate change legislation, increased funding for the National Science Foundation, stem cell research, and green energy initiatives. Obviously, these aren’t the types of efforts that Republicans tend to support. It’s not hard to see why GOPers wouldn’t want to shell out the $146 membership fee to join an organization whose main mission is to advocate for issues they personally oppose.
So it makes sense that the Pew poll may be skewed in favor of liberal Democrats. But the question of where most scientists stand on the political spectrum is still worth looking into, and I’m curious to see what a broader study might show.
commentary.org |
