SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longz
To: Lane3 who wrote (314100)12/24/2024 10:45:56 AM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 362599
 
>> For the problem of the attitude that some people have that that it's OK to arrogantly impose their values on others by fiat, depriving others of their agency and dignity not to mention their liberty, not so much.

As the previous discussion suggested, the framework for these concepts as law and not mere tradition is well-established. You have it in your mind that unlimited abortion rights constitutes essential freedom. The point I've tried to make is that there are two sides to this story and for the time being any solution must involve an element of compromise. In this country, such compromise is reached with the 50 states choosing independently what the law should be for their state.

Then, if the public in CA wants no control over abortion that is their right. If Louisiana wants significant control they that is their right as well. Seems reasonable to think of that as a compromise solution.

This allows states to each have their own freedom. That is probably the best we can do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News