SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 180.90+2.1%Oct 31 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sbfm who wrote (191833)1/4/2025 6:59:58 AM
From: sbfm2 Recommendations

Recommended By
JeffreyHF
Lance Bredvold

  Read Replies (1) of 196412
 
Capitalism has the fix for a greedy licensor: an alternative IP emerges to either keep the greedy licensor in check or to bury the licensor. Now, that might take time and money, but that's our system.

A court is not an alternative to a system with those incentives; involvement of the court will simply gum up the works and entrench existing players. The courts are not equipped to play the role of picking winners and losers; courts are equipped to enforce/interpret existing agreements. Courts are too slow, lack expertise, operate on a different clock, are not responsive to markets, etc.

I view the Q CC as seeking damages/remedy for the breach of an existing agreement and a mechanism for time so as to allow ARM alternatives to emerge (or a tool to negotiate a settlement).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News