SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ron Flanigan who wrote (48486)2/21/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: Lurker  Read Replies (1) of 58324
 
<<When I recovered $2+Million for 2 teenage children who lost their mother to a
hospital by reason of the hospital's negligence and the negligence of 2 interns I did
not feel a bit guilty when the hospital's
"Damage Control Officer" thought I was a low-life.>>

You consider this comparable to the Iomega suit. Let's see, the lawyers got $272,000 and the plaintiffs got $3.00. The lawyers got 90,000 times the money as any plaintiff.

Let's see, if you got 90,000 times the money as your plaintiff, you got $1,999,978 and the plaintiff got $22 (since you say they are comparable cases).

Yup, I would definitely say you are thief by taking all of their money and leaving them with only $22. In fact, assuming your judgement is correct, you are a real scumbag.

"Ron, Ron, Flanigan
Took the money from the victim
and away he ran"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext