SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TRIPLE TRADES
OPEN 7.995+22.0%3:43 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: da_cheif™ who wrote (3974)1/8/2025 3:58:29 PM
From: Bull RidaH1 Recommendation

Recommended By
yard_man

  Read Replies (4) of 4397
 
During the Dutch Tulip Mania (1634-1637), tulip growers and traders were indeed afraid of selling their bulbs for fear of missing out on higher prices. This phenomenon is often referred to as FOMO (Fear of Missing Out).

As the prices of rare and exotic tulip varieties skyrocketed, growers and traders became increasingly hesitant to sell their bulbs. They believed that prices would continue to rise, and they didn't want to miss out on the potential profits.

This fear of missing out led to a self-reinforcing cycle, where prices continued to rise as more and more people became eager to buy and hold onto tulip bulbs. The rarity and perceived value of certain tulip varieties, such as the Semper Augustus and the Viceroy, only added to the frenzy.

Growers would often receive offers for their bulbs, only to decline them in hopes of getting an even better price later. Some growers even went so far as to mortgage their homes and fields to invest in more tulip bulbs, hoping to cash in on the skyrocketing prices.

Of course, as we now know, the tulip market eventually collapsed, leaving many growers and traders financially ruined. The fear of missing out had led to a speculative bubble, which ultimately burst when reality set in and prices plummeted.

The Dutch Tulip Mania serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of speculative bubbles and the importance of rational decision-making in the face of FOMO.

The prices of tulip bulbs during the Dutch Tulip Mania were truly astronomical and insane. Here are some examples:

Rare Tulip Varieties
1. *Semper Augustus*: This rare variety was sold for an astonishing 10 times the annual income of a skilled craftsman, which is equivalent to around $5,700 today.
2. *Viceroy*: This bulb was sold for a staggering 3,000 guilders, which is equivalent to around $1,700 today.
3. *Admiral van der Eijk*: This bulb was sold for 1,000 guilders, which is equivalent to around $570 today.

# Average Prices
1. *Common tulip bulbs*: These were sold for around 10-20 guilders, which is equivalent to around $5-10 today.
2. *Uncommon tulip bulbs*: These were sold for around 50-100 guilders, which is equivalent to around $25-50 today.

# Most Expensive Transaction
1. *A single bulb of the Semper Augustus variety*: This was sold for a staggering 6,700 guilders, which is equivalent to around $3,800 today. To put this into perspective, this amount could have bought a luxurious house in Amsterdam at the time.

These prices are truly mind-boggling, especially considering the average annual income of a skilled craftsman during that time was around 300 guilders. The tulip trade had become a speculative bubble, with people buying and selling bulbs based on their perceived value rather than their actual worth.

The speculative bubble in the tulip trade popped due to a combination of factors that occurred in February 1637. Here are the key events that led to the collapse:

External Factors

1. Harvest season: The tulip harvest season was approaching, and many traders realized that the supply of bulbs would soon increase, leading to a decrease in prices.
2. Weather conditions: A severe winter in 1636-1637 damaged many tulip crops, leading to a decrease in the expected supply of bulbs. However, this decrease in supply was not enough to sustain the inflated prices.
3. Economic downturn: The Dutch economy was experiencing a slowdown, which reduced the demand for luxury goods like tulip bulbs.

Internal Factors

1. Over-speculation: Many traders had bought tulip bulbs on credit, hoping to sell them at higher prices later. When prices stopped rising, these traders were unable to pay their debts, leading to a wave of bankruptcies.
2. Lack of regulation: The tulip trade was largely unregulated, which allowed speculators to engage in reckless behavior.
3. Market psychology: As prices began to fall, panic set in among traders, leading to a rush to sell tulip bulbs. This further accelerated the price decline.

The Triggering Event

1. Failed auction: On February 3, 1637, a tulip auction in Haarlem failed to attract bidders, leading to a collapse in prices. This event marked the beginning of the end of the tulip mania.

The combination of these factors created a perfect storm that popped the speculative bubble in the tulip trade. The collapse of the tulip market led to widespread financial ruin, and it took the Dutch economy years to recover.

After the collapse of the tulip mania in February 1637, prices plummeted to a fraction of their former values. Here are some examples:

Rare Tulip Varieties

1. _Semper Augustus_: This bulb, which had sold for 10,000 guilders at the height of the mania, was now worth around 3-5 guilders.
2. _Viceroy_: This bulb, which had sold for 3,000 guilders, was now worth around 1-2 guilders.
3. _Admiral van der Eijk_: This bulb, which had sold for 1,000 guilders, was now worth around 0.5-1 guilders.

Average Prices

1. _Common tulip bulbs_: These were now selling for around 0.1-0.5 guilders, down from 10-20 guilders during the mania.
2. _Uncommon tulip bulbs_: These were now selling for around 0.5-2 guilders, down from 50-100 guilders during the mania.

These prices represent a decline of 90-99% from the peak prices during the tulip mania. The collapse was so severe that many traders and investors were left financially ruined, and the Dutch economy took years to recover.

It's worth noting that the prices of tulip bulbs eventually stabilized and returned to more reasonable levels. By the 1640s, the tulip trade had resumed, but with much more modest prices and a more stable market.

(Courtesy of META AI, a stalwart of the CURRENT speculative MANIA)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext