SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : ImmunityBio converts from Immunomedics
IBRX 2.139+0.9%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: publicsceenname who wrote (840)1/21/2025 2:20:30 PM
From: TinfoilHat4 Recommendations

Recommended By
bobbseytwins2001
End2War
erippetoe
Fitzhughlaw

  Read Replies (1) of 1230
 
Not really a threat (see below for clarity on logic), in my experience oncologists rely on long-term data and clinical experience.

IBRX has an on-market option with approval, guidelines and reimbursement plus very long-term outcome data, so they have a big head start.

Had a scan of the JnJ data and it appears murky. Topline number was 83% CR however when digging into the data it was 68% CR via central review at 9m and 57% CR Kaplan meier at 12m (implies a pretty steep drop from 9m to 12m). Remember Anktiva plateaued at 57% CR for more than 4yrs.

So JnJ needs to continue sharing updates on long-term efficacy, and my thinking is that a pair of chemo drugs directly into the bladder is not likely to outperform stimulating the immune system aka Anktiva.

Odds are strong that the JnJ data dips well below 50% CR within the first 2yrs, and in that scenario it would be used after Anktiva+BCG fails, not before.

Therefore not necessarily a threat, rather an additional tool in the Oncs aresenal post Anktiva.

We're ready to fill the gap up to 4.50, long term moving avg is around 4.90.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext