SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ciena (CIEN)
CIEN 214.35+0.7%Dec 9 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gary Korn who wrote (1415)2/22/1998 6:24:00 PM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (3) of 12623
 
<< I have a comment. I don't know where CIEN's stock price ends in 1998, but I do know that Sergem's post is just plain wrong on two issues >>

I don't know if I am confident enough about my knowledge of WDM to say that Sergem is wrong, but I do think he has possibly overlooked a few important points.

OC-192 electronics are much more complicated and expensive than OC-48 ones. They might even be more prone to problems. Even if 16 channel OC-192 WDM is available (160Gb/s), in many cases carriers will choose to use OC-48 at say, 40 channels (100Gb/s) because it is simpler and/or less expensive. There are many ways to skin a cat and OC-192 is not always the easiest or best solution. I think QWST is running OC-192 because they are laying new fiber which is well-suited to handle OC-192 speeds. I also think that OC-192 has been used more extensively for long trans-ocean runs undersea.

Furthermore AT&T has some of the oldest fiber in service. From what I have read some of their fiber might not even be in good enough condition to even run at OC-192 speeds. Therefore solutions running at OC-48 would be the only effective solution. I don't know how much of the installed fiber is not suitable to run at OC-192 but I would bet it's enough to make a difference.

Perhaps our resident expert Mr. Bagwell would have some insight on the subject.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext