We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon
Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
interesting, that netizens pointing out the obvious, and are curious why folks are misreporting the nature of the Alaska F35_ crash, as one involving a F35A as opposed to the truth, a crash of F35B; for there was no forward momentum at all to the crashed plane because IT WASN'T and COULDN'T HAVE BEEN moving forward. It was making a vertical take off or landing, meaning it was a F35B.
Or is it the case that a F35A can totally lose forward moments and drop out of the sky like a rock?
Global airforces have 3,xxx of the F35 all variants, with less than 1,5xx able to fly at any given time, and less than 1,000 able to fight at any time, meaning actual cost of combat-ready F35s is 3x$80M or $240M per unit, and the lot of them have poisoned the airforces of this planet, am told
TheF-35Ais the U.S. Air Force’s “latest fifth-generation fighter” that replaced an aging fleet of F-16 Fighting Falcons and A-10 Thunderbolt II’s, according to an Eielson fact sheet.
