SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: longz2/6/2025 5:02:09 PM
1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 1576880
 
From miraje===>> Climate lawsuit tossed. With prejudice.. Big Dog's Boom Boom Room Message Board - Msg: 35014314

list in point form who won?... foxnews.com NJ lawsuit claiming oil companies cause climate change dealt massive blow in court The climate change movement was issued a massive blow on Wednesday after a trial judge permanently closed a Democrat-charged lawsuit claiming that big oil was to blame for climate-caused damages in the state. In 2022, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin filed a lawsuit against the country's largest oil companies, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, Shell, as well as the American Petroleum Institute, claiming that the fossil fuel industry was worsening the effects of climate change, and therefore, causing damage to the state. However, the case was tossed out on Wednesday by New Jersey Superior Court Judge Douglas Hurd, who ruled that lawful oil companies could not be held liable for worldwide emissions. The case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be reopened. "Plaintiffs seek to regulate the nationwide—and even worldwide—marketing and distribution of lawful products on which billions of people outside of New Jersey rely to heat their homes, power their hospitals and schools, produce and transport their food, and manufacture countless items essential to the safety, wellbeing, and advancement of modern society," said Hurd, who issued the ruling. Energy experts told Fox News Digital that the dismissal sends a clear message that "energy policy should be set by elected officials, not litigated into existence by activist lawyers." "This ruling is a major victory for common sense and the rule of law. Climate activists have been using the courts to push their radical agenda, but judges are increasingly rejecting these baseless lawsuits that threaten energy security and economic stability," Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute and former Texas representative, said in a statement shared with Fox News Digital.

ChatGPT said:

Winners:
  • Big Oil Companies: ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, Shell
  • American Petroleum Institute (API)
  • Judge Douglas Hurd: Ruled in favor of oil companies, dismissing the case with prejudice
  • Energy Industry & Policy Advocates: Decision reinforces that energy policy should be determined by elected officials, not courts
  • American Energy Institute (Jason Isaac, CEO): Celebrated the ruling as a victory for common sense and energy security
Losers:
  • New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin: Filed the lawsuit but lost
  • Climate Activists & Lawsuit Supporters: Sought accountability for fossil fuel companies but faced legal defeat
  • State of New Jersey (Plaintiffs): The case was permanently dismissed and cannot be reopened


4o
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext