SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (1521185)2/9/2025 10:13:13 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Eric

  Read Replies (1) of 1573039
 

"When you use the word "denier" you misinform and are not being scientific"

When you deny that the climate is changing because of our activities, you're denying science. I do appreciate Steff's metaphor, tho.




Humans experimenting with climate's 'playing nice' » Yale Climate Connections
How long will the remarkably, but inexplicably, 11,000 years of global climatic stability last? Uncertainty abounds, but in meantime the risky experiment continues.

by Peter SinclairOctober 3, 2017




Like “rats inside the experiment,” Neils Bohr Institute glaciology professor Jorgen Peder Steffensen says of us humans when he considers the risks of a sudden reconfiguration of global circulation which could, among other things, cause long-term drying across America’s breadbasket states.

“That’s going to impact the entire world,” Steffensen cautions in recognizing that the 11,000 years of the interglacial period since the last ice age “has been unreasonably stable. And we don’t know why” or how long that stability may persist.



Steffensen, in exceptionally eloquent and straightforward language, acknowledges that models consistently point to a gradual global increase in temperatures as a result of the continue widespread combustion of fossil fuels and increased emissions of carbon dioxide. “But that’s assuming the climate plays nice,” he says.

“And we actually know from the ice cores that the climate does not play nice all the time.”

Interviewed by Yale Climate Connections regular videographer Peter Sinclair in Kangeraussuaq, Greenland, this past summer, Steffensen, a professor of glaciology, sees an analogy between the continued emissions of greenhouse gases and the risks posed to the U.S. and global economy by the 2006/2007 widespread sales of subprime loans.

Deeply involved in drilling of ice cores on the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets since 1980, Steffensen says in this month’s “This is not cool” video that changes in global heat flows have “come about suddenly” in the past and “are reflected, as a mirror image,” in Antarctic ice cores.

“You see that inside an ice age, the climate is extremely unstable. And you have this sequence of abrupt climate changes that happen, basically, from one year to the next.” He says each cycle lasts “about a couple thousand years…. We had that 26 times in the last ice age.”

Such “whipsaw” climate change have been missing during the past 11,000 years while human civilization has been arising. “So we are assuming that this is standard. Our collective memory refers to this as normal.”

But he is concerned that human activities could be “tipping the climate into an intermediate period of climate changes…. We can face a climate change that happens just as fast as the financial crisis,” Steffensen says. In that case, agricultural activity worldwide could be adversely affected … “the weather will change, and it will not change back” quickly.

“We don’t know where the threshold is,” Steffensen says of the ongoing human “experiment” with climate change. “But we are rats inside the experiment.”



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext