SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : ImmunityBio converts from Immunomedics
IBRX 2.139+0.9%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: End2War3/3/2025 4:43:19 PM
3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Ploni
rodneyh07
waitwatchwander

   of 1229
 
IBRX filed a monumentally long 10K (of 240 pages) today, leading off with PSS's statement of his "Founder's Vision," which runs to P17 of the Form 10K, and this Founder's Vision is summarized, fact checked, and explained below by Grok3:

Summary of PSS's Founder's Vision
Patrick Soon-Shiong, M.D., founder of ImmunityBio, presents a 35-year vision to revolutionize cancer care by shifting the focus from traditional high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy to immunotherapy that activates the body’s natural immune system, particularly natural killer (NK) cells and T cells. His hypothesis, born from observations at UCLA treating diabetic and pancreatic cancer patients, posits that conventional treatments destroy lymphocytes (NK and T cells), which are critical for long-term tumor suppression and immune memory, thus "winning the battle but losing the war" against cancer.
Key elements of his vision include:

  1. Harnessing NK and T Cells: PSS believes NK and T cells are central to fighting cancer. Tumors evade immunity by suppressing these cells, and chemotherapy exacerbates this by causing lymphopenia (low lymphocyte counts), correlating with poor survival outcomes.

  2. Paradigm Shift: He advocates moving away from tumor-centric, short-term response-focused treatments (e.g., high-dose chemo/radiation) to host-centric therapies that use the tumor as an antigenic source to stimulate long-term immune responses, potentially creating a "universal therapeutic cancer vaccine."

  3. Key Products:

    • ANKTIVA: An IL-15 receptor superagonist approved by the FDA in 2024 for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). It proliferates NK and T cells, reverses lymphopenia, and may enhance checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy.

    • PD-L1 t-haNK: A CAR-NK cell therapy, combined with ANKTIVA, granted Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation by the FDA on February 27, 2025, for reversing lymphopenia in pancreatic cancer patients receiving standard care.

    • ABRAXANE: A nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, approved in 2005, designed to induce immunogenic cell death rather than tolerogenic death from high-dose chemo.

  4. QUILT Trials: Clinical trials (Quantum Integrative Lifelong Trials) since 2017 have tested this hypothesis across multiple tumor types (e.g., NMIBC, pancreatic cancer, triple-negative breast cancer), showing complete remissions and supporting the vaccine concept.

  5. Immunotherapy 2.0: ANKTIVA aims to overcome tumor evasion tactics like MHC-I loss (making tumors "cold") by activating NK cells, restoring MHC-I expression, and rescuing CPIs, potentially transforming cold tumors into "hot" ones responsive to therapy.

PSS envisions ANKTIVA as a backbone for a universal cancer vaccine, applicable across tumor types and even for prevention (e.g., in high-risk Lynch Syndrome patients). This vision challenges 50 years of oncology standards, advocating for lymphocyte monitoring (e.g., absolute lymphocyte count, ALC) as a biomarker.

Fact-Checking Key Claims

  1. 35-Year Hypothesis and UCLA Experience:

    • Verification: PSS’s career timeline aligns with this claim. He was a surgeon at UCLA in the 1980s and 1990s, known for pancreas transplants and cancer surgeries (e.g., Whipple procedure). His work on immunosuppression and tumor evasion is plausible given this background, though specific publications from 1990 linking NK cells to both scenarios are not explicitly cited here.

    • Plausibility: The dual role of NK cells in transplant rejection and tumor evasion is supported by immunology literature (e.g., NK cells interact with T cells via MHC-I recognition), making his hypothesis scientifically grounded.

  2. FDA Approvals and RMAT Designation:

    • ANKTIVA Approval: Confirmed. The FDA approved ANKTIVA (nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln) with BCG for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC on April 22, 2024. The label’s mechanism—proliferation of NK, CD8+, and memory T cells without T-reg expansion—is consistent with the filing.

    • RMAT Designation: Confirmed. The FDA granted RMAT designation for ANKTIVA and PD-L1 t-haNK on February 27, 2025, for reversing lymphopenia in pancreatic cancer patients, as announced by ImmunityBio. This aligns with the timeline and intent stated.

    • ABRAXANE: Confirmed. Approved in 2005 for breast cancer, with later approvals for lung and pancreatic cancer, matching PSS’s timeline and description.

  3. Lymphopenia and Survival:

    • Verification: Studies cited in the 10K (e.g., lymphopenia <1,000/µL linked to worse relapse-free and overall survival) are consistent with peer-reviewed literature. For example, papers in Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research (pre-2025) show lymphopenia as a poor prognostic factor across cancers (hazard ratios 1.25-7.70 align with cited ranges).

    • ANKTIVA’s Role: The claim that ANKTIVA reverses lymphopenia is supported by its FDA-approved mechanism (IL-15 stimulation increases NK and T-cell counts), though long-term clinical outcomes are still under investigation (e.g., QUILT trials).

  4. QUILT Trials and Complete Remissions:

    • Verification: ImmunityBio’s QUILT trials (e.g., QUILT 88, QUILT 3055) are real, ongoing studies registered with the FDA, testing ANKTIVA and related therapies. Claims of complete remissions in late-stage cancers (e.g., NMIBC, pancreatic cancer) are supported by company press releases and interim data (e.g., QUILT 3.032 for NMIBC), though peer-reviewed publications are limited as of March 2025.

    • Caveat: Full validation requires final trial data and independent review, expected in future BLA submissions.

  5. Cold to Hot Tumor Conversion:

    • Plausibility: The mechanism—NK cells recognizing MHC-I-negative tumors, secreting IFN-? to restore MHC-I, and enabling T-cell activity—is supported by immunology principles (e.g., "missing-self" hypothesis, IFN-?’s role in MHC upregulation). Preclinical and early clinical data from ImmunityBio (e.g., QUILT trials) suggest this, but large-scale confirmation is pending.

  6. Universal Cancer Vaccine:

    • Status: This remains a hypothesis. The NANT Cancer Vaccine (NCV) concept and ANKTIVA’s potential are under investigation (e.g., Lynch Syndrome trials), but no FDA approval exists for a universal vaccine as of March 2025. Patent US11071774-B2 exists, covering related immunotherapy methods, supporting R&D efforts.

Explanation of Key Concepts

  1. NK and T Cells in Cancer:

    • NK cells kill cells lacking MHC-I (a tumor evasion tactic), while T cells (especially CD8+ cytotoxic T cells) target MHC-I-presented antigens. PSS argues that tumors suppress both, and chemo/radiation worsen this by depleting lymphocytes, reducing immune memory. ANKTIVA (IL-15 agonist) boosts these cells’ proliferation and activity.

  2. Lymphopenia:

    • Defined as low lymphocyte counts (<1,000/µL), it’s a known side effect of chemo/radiation and a predictor of poor survival. PSS proposes ANKTIVA as a "rescue" therapy, akin to EPOGEN (for anemia) or NEUPOGEN (for neutropenia), shifting focus to ALC as a biomarker.

  3. Immunogenic vs. Tolerogenic Cell Death:

    • High-dose chemo kills tumors but induces tolerogenic death (no immune activation), while PSS’s approach (e.g., ABRAXANE, low-dose metronomic chemo) stresses tumors to release danger signals (DAMPs), triggering an immune response resembling a vaccine effect.

  4. Cold vs. Hot Tumors:

    • "Cold" tumors lack T-cell infiltration or MHC-I, resisting CPIs (e.g., pembrolizumab). "Hot" tumors have active immune responses. ANKTIVA’s NK activation and IFN-? secretion aim to "heat up" cold tumors, making them CPI-responsive.

  5. Universal Vaccine Vision:

    • PSS envisions using tumors as antigen sources, combined with immune stimulants (ANKTIVA, NK therapies, adenoviral vaccines), to train the immune system across tumor types. This contrasts with anatomy-specific treatments, aiming for broad, durable immunity.

Conclusion
PSS’s vision is a bold rethinking of cancer care, rooted in decades of clinical observation and supported by ImmunityBio’s FDA-approved products (ANKTIVA, ABRAXANE) and ongoing trials. Fact-checking confirms key milestones (e.g., FDA approvals, RMAT designation) and aligns scientific claims with established immunology, though the universal vaccine concept remains aspirational pending further evidence. His approach challenges oncology’s reliance on cytotoxic therapies, proposing a future where immune activation and memory dominate—a paradigm shift with significant potential if fully realized.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext